Thursday, April 14, 2011

The Promise and Peril of Robots, In TV and Real Life

I've been exposed to the theme and overall idea of robots in film, and in possibility since I was a child. While this fact makes it less of an exoteric thing for me, it does still spark awe and curiosity. I find that there are specific differences that distinguish a positive robot from a negative one. For instance, the "Touch Bionics i-limb hand" is a remarkable example of the success a robot can bring to a person. This robotic limb replaces an arm, and more importantly, a hand, for a man who has lost his original one. The technology behind the hand is in the shoulder portion of the limb where sensors pick up on muscle movements which control the hand. As the user displays, there are some troubles with the hand, where some of the intended functions are misguided. However, the possibilities are clear. The narrator notes, "Campbells robotic arm is trying to compete with something that took millions of years to evolve." This is important because it dismisses the lack of function the robotic limb sometimes has, by contrasting it to the complexity of human hands. This is also imperative to the entire argument for and against robots because in one way, robots may be excused for lack of time development, and robots are negative because they may never be able to compete with human function.


VS.

So while we understand the vantage that humans have in contrast to robots, I think that the fear of robots is in the possibility that this relationship may one day be reversed. A film that provides this sort of paranoia is I, Robot. This film, directed by Alex Proyas is about a robot filled world where robots coexist with humans, and the robots benefit humans daily life by being garbage men, walking the dogs etc. When things go awry for one robot who is accused of murder, a spark goes off where all of the robots attack the man who is the accuser, and the world they live in. The danger lies in the great numbers of robots that exist, as well as their surmounting strength and abilities. This kind of human disadvantage is scary, and the film plays up our fears of this sort. I think for most people, robots are acceptable up until the point where they must interact with one. I think robots are inspiring to think about, but unacceptable to coexist with. I find that the reason films mostly play up these fears is because they do still exist, and for that reason, they always will because they hone those same fears within us. There are rarely, or none to my knowledge that portray robots such as Watson who are safe, intelligent robots.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Brainstorming for my Research Paper

While all of the options for the research paper topics appeal to me, some seem more feasible than others. The two topics that interested me most are the two I'll decide between to tackle for my paper. The research paper idea #1 is my first option. I'd like to do a close reading/ analysis of the original issue of The New Yorker magazine which featured Ian McEwan's "Us or Me". I'll then discuss it's presentation of science in terms of the short story itself, with regards to the advertising and current events featured in the issue. I find this option appealing because I think it will be a fun challenge to get my hands on such an issue, and I also think it'd be interesting to revisit that time and analyze it. I've never done a research paper using this method, and I think this will force me to use new, and different skills. I also think that the magazine issue will provide plenty of relevant information and resource so that I can write a solid paper. I'm slightly worried about attaining an original copy, or e-copy of the issue, so that may be the one losing point for this option.

However, the option that is giving me no trouble at all is research paper idea #2. I'd be very interested to discuss the promise and peril of technology because I have plenty to say on the topic. I also enjoy being able to write a paper that presents both sides, and that is a requirement of this essay.  I am very interested in either discussing the challenges of a "car-driven future" vs. global warming OR new computers vs. e-waste. I enjoyed the short film I viewed in class about the truth of e-waste, and ever since I'd been interested in gaining more knowledge on the subject. However, I also really liked "The Worlds Fair" reading and advertisements we viewed earlier in the semester, which would aid me to write about the promises of a utopian suburbia.


After giving it much thought and consideration, I've decided on the subject of Ian McEwans "Us or Me" in the original issue of The New Yorker magazine. I decided to embark on this challenge because it will be slightly more difficult but I think I'll find that my end product will be more rewarding.